Get on board with the research ethics review process
Cummings, L.
Canadian Nurse 108(8): 28-33
2012
ISSN/ISBN: 0008-4581 PMID: 23156015 Document Number: 659348
Document emailed within 1 workday
Related Documents
1979: In-vitro embryo research gets ethics-board OK Medical World News 20(14): 25-26Nimmo, A.; Taylor, T.D. 1998: Survey of educationally qualified and board-eligible prosthodontists on the board-certification process Journal of Prosthodontics: Official Journal of the American College of Prosthodontists 7(3): 192-197
Thuline, H.C. 1984: Workings of a state human research review board Birth Defects Original Article Series 20(6): 44-52
Chin, L.Judy.; Rifai-Bashjawish, H.; Kleinert, K.; Saltman, A.; Leu, C-Shiun.; Klitzman, R. 2011: HIV/AIDS research conducted in the developing world and sponsored by the developed world: reporting of research ethics committee review in two countries Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics: Jerhre 6(3): 83-91
Thörn, Åk. 2014: Swedish medical research needs reflection and better ethics review Lakartidningen 111(29-31): 1250-1251
Freauf, M.; Puckeridge, N. 2015: To Board or not to Board: An Evidence Review of Prehospital Spinal Immobilization Jems: a Journal of Emergency Medical Services 40(11): 43-45
Read, C. 1996: Adjuvant treatment with tamoxifen. Local research ethics committees should review their approval of prevention trial Bmj 312(7037): 1036
Grommers, F.J. 1993: Embryo research: ethics of technology and technique of ethics Tijdschrift Voor Diergeneeskunde 118(20): 645-647
Greenaway, J.M.; Brine, D.M.; Eyers, A.A.; Harris, M.A.; McWilliam, D.B. 1992: The management of terminally ill patients. Ethics of Clinical Practice Subcommittee, Ethics Review Committee, Central Sydney Health Service Medical Journal of Australia 157(4): 275-276
1989: The Veterinary Service Board. Establishment of the 'Commission on Advice, Ethics and Biotechnology for Animals' Tijdschrift Voor Diergeneeskunde 114(10): 585-586
Harbison, K.G.; Bunde, D.P. 1991: The Board of Medical Practice and its disciplinary process Minnesota Medicine 74(12): 33-35
Strode, A.; Singh, P.P. 2014: Compensation for research-related harm: the implications of Venter v Roche Products (Pty) Limited and Others for research ethics committees South African Medical Journal 104(11): 759-761
McCooey, A.K. 1993: O/WM board members are invited to peer review AHCPR draft of literature review summary on dressings Ostomy/Wound Management 39(4): 8 10
Locatelli, P.; Montefusco, V.; Sini, E.; Restifo, N.; Facchini, R.; Torresani, M. 2013: ICT and mobile health to improve clinical process delivery. a research project for therapy management process innovation Studies in Health Technology and Informatics 192: 1105
Minacori, R.; Refolo, P.; Sacchini, D.; Spagnolo, A.G. 2015: Research Ethics Committees and clinical research in Italy: where are we going? European Review for Medical and Pharmacological Sciences 19(3): 481-485
Petrick, T.J. 1990: Ethics and the reproductive process Ginecologia y Obstetricia de Mexico 58(Suppl 1): 35-38
Larsson, A.; Zetterström, R. 1979: Research ethics and pediatric clinical research Lakartidningen 76(4): 203-205
Orr, R.D.; Shelton, W. 2009: A process and format for clinical ethics consultation Journal of Clinical Ethics 20(1): 79-89
Strode, A.E.; Singh, P.P.; Slack, C.M.; Wassenaar, D.R. 2018: Research ethics committees in a tight spot: Approving consent strategies for child research that are prima facie illegal but are ethical in terms of national guidelines South African Medical Journal 108(10): 828-832
Diniz, D. 2002: New reproductive technologies, ethics and gender: the legislative process in Brazil Developing World Bioethics 2(2): 144-158