Fiber post techniques for anatomical root variations
Boksman, L.; Hepburn, A.B.; Kogan, E.; Friedman, M.; de Rijk, W.
Dentistry Today 30(5): 104; 106-111
2011
ISSN/ISBN: 8750-2186 PMID: 21650123 Document Number: 654043
In contemporary dental practice, there is no remaining reason to use metallic posts, custom or prefabricated. Many cases that several years ago would have required a retentive post will not require that post today, because of the many improvements in bonding agents and composite resin restoratives. However, in cases where less than 50% of coronal tooth structure remains--or in other cases wherein the judgment of the clinician a post is indicated--there are now aesthetic, non-corrosive, fracture resistant and radiopaque alternatives for all varieties that save time and money without compromise. Their most compelling advantage, regardless of the geometry or amount of residual tooth structure, is the protection from root fracture that a low modulus restoration provides. In selecting the materials (posts, resins) for these techniques, the dentist is advised not to cut corners, and to seek the strongest and most radiopaque products available.