Efficacy and safety of high-dose toremifene for hormone-responsive advanced or metastatic breast cancer patients with failed prior treatment by aromatase inhibitors

Ohtake, T.; Yasuda, M.; Watanabe, K.; Ito, T.; Ito, J.; Miyamoto, K.; Yoshida, S.; Abe, N.; Ishigame, T.; Ishii, M.; Kimijima, I.; Takenoshita, S.

Gan to Kagaku Ryoho. Cancer and ChemoTherapy 36(9): 1459-1463

2009


ISSN/ISBN: 0385-0684
PMID: 19755813
Document Number: 628924
Recently, aromatase inhibitors (AI) are widely used in postoperative adjuvant therapy for breast cancer. Nevertheless, studies of postoperative therapeutic strategies for recurrent breast cancer are insufficient. Data on 12 post-menopausal advanced/recurrent breast cancer patients in our department during June 2003- April 2007 were used for this study. No patient had responded to high-dose toremifene (TOR), a third-generation AI. Their therapeutic outcomes were analyzed retrospectively. The median observation period of the subjects was 16.1 months (4.0-40.9 months). Subjects were all hormone-sensitive. Overexpression of HER2 protein was found in only one case. During AI therapy immediately prior, exemestane (EXE) and anastrozole (ANA) had been given in nine and three cases, respectively. The complete response rate of AI therapy was 16.7% (2/12). The clinical benefit rate was 58.3% (7/12). The median of time to progression (TTP) was 33.8 weeks. Neither the presence nor absence of past history of treatment with tamoxifen (TAM) or other chemotherapies affected the anti-tumor effect. Analysis by the site of metastasis or recurrence revealed that the therapeutic effects were better for non-life-threatening cases in the lung, pleura, soft tissue, etc. The severities of adverse effects were all less than grade 2; the major ones were flushing and sweating. Results show that high-dose TOR given at an early stage can provide clinical benefits for post-menopausal advanced/recurrent breast cancer not responding to AI.

Document emailed within 1 workday
Secure & encrypted payments