Academics draft protocol for handling research misconduct
White, C.
Bmj 337: A1612
2008
ISSN/ISBN: 0959-8138 PMID: 18786968 Document Number: 619481
Document emailed within 1 workday
Related Documents
Sotomayor, H.; Behn, V.; Cruz, M.; Naveas, R.; Sotomayor, C.; Fernández, P.; Florio, R.M.; Romero, M. 2000: Smoking among academics, non-academics and students of the Universidad de Concepción Revista Medica de Chile 128(9): 977-984Winterton, N. 1996: Misconduct in research. Medical Research Council is setting up rigorous procedures Bmj 313(7049): 109
Strydom, C. 2005: Handling protocol of posterior composites Rubber Dam Sadj: Journal of the South African Dental Association 60(7): 292-293
Bauer, G. 1992: Clinical research improves national economy--but not with the academics isolated in their ivory towers Lakartidningen 89(23): 2075-2076
Strydom, C. 2006: Handling protocol of posterior composites--part 3: matrix systems Sadj: Journal of the South African Dental Association 61(1): 18 20-1
Smith, R. 1998: The need for a national body for research misconduct. Nothing less will reassure the public Bmj 316(7146): 1686-1687
Appler, W.D.; McMann, G.L. 1989: View from the Nation's Capital. Combating research misconduct Journal of Clinical Psychopharmacology 9(2): 137-138
Klasen, E.C.; Overbeke, A.J.P.M. 2002: Reporting of scientific misconduct in health care research Nederlands Tijdschrift Voor Geneeskunde 146(35): 1622-1624
Semple, C.A. 2001: Bases and spaces: resources on the web for accessing the draft human genome - II - after publication of the draft Genome Biology 2(6): Reviews 2001
Morimoto, K.; Saitoh, M.; Hemmi, A.; Yamamoto, M.; Kaminuma, T. 1992: Preparation of the first draft of environmental health criteria for acetonitrile: production process of the draft Eisei Shikenjo Hokoku. Bulletin of National Institute of Hygienic Sciences 110: 73-77
Nylenna, M. 1993: Misconduct in research and scientific dishonesty. The academic system of qualifications must be revised Tidsskrift for den Norske Laegeforening: Tidsskrift for Praktisk Medicin Ny Raekke 113(25): 3119-3121
Hall, D. 2000: Investigating allegations of research misconduct. It is time to learn the lessons from Stoke Bmj 321(7272): 1346-7; Author Reply 1348-9
Dyer, C. 2009: Misconduct panel investigates research of doctor convicted of lacing lover's drink Bmj 339: B4906
1999: Personal information in medical research: excerpts from draft guidelines Bulletin of medical ethics No. 151: 9-11
1999: Personal information in medical research: excerpts from draft guidelines Bulletin of medical ethics No. 151: 9-11
Ema, M.; Fukui, Y.; Aoyama, H.; Fujiwara, M.; Fuji, J.; Inouye, M.; Iwase, T.; Kihara, T.; Oi, A.; Otani, H.; Shinomiya, M.; Sugioka, K.; Yamano, T.; Yamashita, K.H.; Tanimura, T. 2007: Comments from the Developmental Neurotoxicology Committee of the Japanese Teratology Society on the OECD Guideline for the Testing of Chemicals, Proposal for a New Guideline 426, Developmental Neurotoxicity Study, Draft Document (October 2006 version), and on the Draft Document of the Retrospective Performance Assessment of the Draft Test Guideline 426 on Developmental Neurotoxicity Congenital anomalies 47(2): 74-76
Printz, C. 2012: Draft screening guidelines spark debate: possible drawbacks and long-term effects of new draft guidelines for prostate cancer screening Cancer 118(9): 2335-2336
Kamisaka, Y. 1976: Handling of research and reference materials in clinical nursing - a method in self improvement Nursing Technique 22(5): 119-129
Cunningham, E.H.; Cameron, V.A.; Evans, J.; Irvine, V.; Pitama, S.; Robertson, P. 2007: The development of guidelines for handling samples and specimens collected for research involving Maori New Zealand Medical Journal 120(1264): U2785
Miranda-Novales, M.ía.G.; Villasís-Keever, M.Án. 2015: The research protocol. Part i Revista Alergia Mexico 62(4): 312-317