Implementation analysis of public functions of 161 centers of disease prevention and control in 7 provinces
Su, Z-Xin.; Xie, H-Bin.; Luo, L.; Wang, W-Cheng.; Wang, Y.; Sun, M.; Ma, N.; Yu, J.; Yu, M.; Duan, Y.; Gong, X.; Chen, Z.; Wang, H.; Shi, P.; Liang, Z.; Yang, F.; Wang, D.; Yue, J.; Luo, S.; Hao, M.
Wei Sheng Yan Jiu 34(4): 386-387
2005
ISSN/ISBN: 1000-8020 PMID: 16229253 Document Number: 585240
To evaluate the implementation of public function and items of the centers of disease prevention and control (CDC). 161 centers of disease prevention and control have been investigated by two-stage stratified sampling. The implementation analysis of public function and items of CDC is measured by multiplying average operational proportion and average operational degree. (1) For investigated centers, the average rate of function implementation is 42.9%, with 56.0% at provincial level and 43.7% at city level, 41.3% for the county level, while 49.3% in east areas, 45.4% in middle areas and 35.3% in west areas. (2) Among all 7 functional items, the implemented rate of disease prevention and control is 54.3%, 65.8% for emergency treatment, 35.0% for epidemic situation report and information management of health relative factors, 31.3% for inspection and control of health risk factors, 39.1% for the laboratory examination and evaluation, 36.4% for health education and health promotion, and 56.7% for technological guidance and application study. The implemented degree of public function of CDC was generally lower, varied with regions and levels. Among 7 public functional items, the emergency treatment function had the highest implementation, with the lowest for the inspection and control of health relative factors.