An exploratory, randomized, crossover MRi study of microbicide delivery with the SILCS diaphragm compared to a vaginal applicator
Pentlicky, S.; Rosen, M.; Coffey, P.S.; Kilbourne-Brook, M.; Shaunik, A.; Schreiber, C.A.; Barnhart, K.
Contraception 87(2): 187-192
2013
ISSN/ISBN: 1879-0518 PMID: 22898358 DOI: 10.1016/j.contraception.2012.06.016Document Number: 573363
Microbicide gels studied for HIV prevention often are delivered via a single-use vaginal applicator. Using a contraceptive diaphragm such as the SILCS diaphragm for gel delivery could have advantages, including lower cost and additional pregnancy prevention. We performed an exploratory, nonblinded, randomized, crossover study among healthy, sexually active, nonpregnant women. Using BufferGel, we evaluated three microbicide delivery methods for gel distribution and retention: SILCS single-sided gel delivery, SILCS double-sided gel delivery and a vaginal applicator (without SILCS). Magnetic resonance images were taken at baseline, after gel insertion, and immediately and 6 h after simulated intercourse. Three women completed all gel delivery methods described in this article. Magnetic resonance imaging analysis indicated similar gel spread in the vagina among all three methods. SILCS single-sided gel application resulted in the most consistent longitudinal coverage; SILCS double-sided gel application was the most consistent in the transverse dimension. Gel coverage was similar with all three methods. These results suggest that the SILCS microbicide delivery system is comparable to vaginal applicators for delivery of gel products intravaginally.
Document emailed within 0-6 h
