Use of the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system in renal transplant recipients: a retrospective case review

Ramhendar, T.; Byrne, P.

Contraception 86(3): 288-289

2012


ISSN/ISBN: 0010-7824
PMID: 22305914
DOI: 10.1016/j.contraception.2011.12.008
Document Number: 565119
Our objective was to report on the use of the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (LNG-IUS, Mirena®) in renal transplant recipients. A retrospective case review was done to identify renal transplant recipients for whom a LNG-IUS had been inserted. All of the women had been seen in the Gynecology Department, Beaumont Hospital, during the period 2000 to 2010. Parameters including age, year of transplantation, indication for insertion, duration of use, discontinuation and complications were documented. The main outcome measure was discontinuation of the LNG-IUS due to pelvic infection. Eleven women were identified who had undergone renal transplantation and were using the LNG-IUS. The mean duration of use was 38 (range 1-84) months. Four women were using the LNG-IUS for contraception and seven were using it for the treatment of menorrhagia, either alone or in conjunction with endometrial ablative procedures. One woman discontinued use in order to conceive. There were no unplanned pregnancies. There were no documented cases of pelvic infection in women using the device. Renal transplant recipients have a critical need for safe and effective contraception. The use of the LNG-IUS has been avoided in the patients due to the theoretical risk of intrauterine device-related pelvic infection in immune-suppressed patients. However, on the basis of our results, we believe that it is acceptable to use the LNG-IUS in renal transplant recipients for both contraception and for the treatment of menorrhagia as the theoretical risk of infection in these immune-suppressed patients does not appear to be increased.

Document emailed within 0-6 h
Secure & encrypted payments

Use of the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system in renal transplant recipients: a retrospective case review