Court of Appeal clarifies disciplinary process
Knowsley, A.
New Zealand Medical Journal 115(1161): U170
2002
ISSN/ISBN: 1175-8716 PMID: 12386676 Document Number: 546909
Document emailed within 1 workday
Related Documents
Burda, D. 1990: Two Rockford hospitals appeal to Supreme Court Modern Healthcare 20(27): 3Stone, R. 1995: Disciplinary counseling process Journal of Nursing Administration 25(1): 13-14
Harbison, K.G.; Bunde, D.P. 1991: The Board of Medical Practice and its disciplinary process Minnesota Medicine 74(12): 33-35
Burns, T.; Raphael, F. 1995: Why do so few patients appeal against detention under section 2 of the Mental Health Act? Low appeal rate may reflect trust in doctors' judgment Bmj 310(6988): 1196
Duffy, J. 1986: Supreme Court upholds District Court's Gramm-Rudman decision Health Law Vigil 9(14): 1-3
Carlson, J.; Daly, R.; Zigmond, J. 2011: Appeals court blasts mandate. 11th circuit ruling sets up high court showdown Modern Healthcare 41(33): 4
Bushby, P.A. 1997: Mississippi State clarifies its curriculum Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association 210(11): 1584
Wilcox, K.R. 1985: MDPH clarifies premarital certification requirements Michigan Medicine 84(11): 587
Robeznieks, A. 2007: Setting a new standard. Joint Commission clarifies divide between board, staff Modern Healthcare 37(28): 12-13
Chandramouli, B. 1994: Polk County president clarifies position on single Medicare locality Iowa medicine: journal of the Iowa Medical Society 84(3): 111
Ledbetter, T.L. 2002: IRS Notice 2002-8 clarifies split-dollar life insurance arrangements Healthcare Financial Management: Journal of the Healthcare Financial Management Association 56(4): 58-61
Kuruppu, J.; Novy, K.; Fetter, L.; Oo, S.; Hegarty, K. 2023: 'Family court…sucks out your soul': Australian general practitioners' experiences supporting domestic violence survivors through family court Bmc Primary Care 24(1): 95
Grosskopf, A.; Mondak, J.J. 1998: Do Attitudes Toward Specific Supreme Court Decisions Matter? the Impact of Webster and Texas v. Johnson on Public Confidence in the Supreme Court Political Research Quarterly 51(3): 633-654
Mary Duryee 1992: Mandatory Court Mediation: Demographic Summary and Consumer Evaluation of one Court Service : Executive Summary Family Court Review 30(2): 260-267
Mary Duryee 1992: Mandatory Court Mediation: Demographic Summary and Consumer Evaluation of one Court Service : Executive Summary Family Court Review 30(2): 260-267
Dagan, N. 2020: The Janus face of imprisonment: Contrasting judicial conceptions of imprisonment purposes in the European Court of Human Rights and the Supreme Court of the United States Criminology-Criminal Justice 21(5): 633-649
Flood, C.M.; Lewis, S. 2005: Courting trouble: the Supreme Court's embrace of private health insurance: use and misuse of social science evidence by the Supreme Court--how should Canadian governments respond? Healthcare Policy 1(1): 26-35
Watters, P. 1988: An appeal for textbooks Australian Family Physician 17(7): 520
Koryagin, A.; Koryagin, A. 1981: Appeal to psychiatrists Lancet 2(8255): 1121
Graham, G. 2000: Could the GMC institute an appeal procedure? Bmj 320(7242): 1148