NPs and PAs: what's the malpractice risk?
Crane, M.
Medical Economics 77(6): 205-8 215
2000
ISSN/ISBN: 0025-7206 PMID: 10977209 Document Number: 516791
Document emailed within 1 workday
Related Documents
Maier, C. 2001: Medical malpractice 2000. Malpractice from the viewpoint of expert witnesses if a malpractice insurance carrier Versicherungsmedizin 53(3): 129-137Hannah, H.W. 1986: Reducing the risk of malpractice Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association 189(9): 986
Lugtu, T. 2015: Toward safer EHR use and documentation. Tips for reducing malpractice risk Minnesota Medicine 98(3): 36-37
Crane, M. 1998: The latest malpractice risk: saving your patient's life Medical Economics 75(4): 226-230; 236-238, 241
Geyman, J.P. 1985: Malpractice liability risk and the physician-patient relationship Journal of Family Practice 20(3): 231-232
Davidson, A.T.; Coleman, A.H. 1979: Proposed solution to the malpractice problem: redefining the role of the jury in malpractice cases Journal of the National Medical Association 71(10): 1013-1014
Richman, D. 1987: More risk retention groups forming to provide coverage for malpractice Modern Healthcare 17(10): 68
Velasco, C. 2008: Reducing malpractice risk for physicians providing home care Minnesota Medicine 91(10): 34-36
Hallam, K. 1998: Taking a global risk. MMi Cos. sees gold in foreign malpractice insurance Modern Healthcare 28(44): 40
Wilson, L.L.; Fulton, M. 2000: Risk management: how doctors, hospitals and MDOs can limit the costs of malpractice litigation Medical Journal of Australia 172(2): 77-80
Johnson, L.J. 2008: Malpractice consult. Elements of malpractice: duty comes first Medical Economics 85(13): 24
Johnson, F.E. 1985: MMIE malpractice claim review. Neurology. MMIE Risk Management Committee Minnesota Medicine 68(3): 192
1986: MMIE malpractice claim review. General surgery. MMIE Risk Management Committee Minnesota Medicine 69(2): 93
Kajitani, A.; Asada, M.; Iwai, H.; Kawasaki, S.; Kobayashi, H. 2014: What we can learn from a case of medical malpractice-substantial awards affirmed in medical malpractice case for death after caesarean section from delayed detection of intraperitoneal hemorrhage; in contrast to damages awarded for a motor vehicle accident, damages for medical accidents was estimated to be higher in this case on the basis of a decision on liability in claimant's favor Nihon Geka Gakkai zasshi 115(6): 343-344
Fisher, T.L. 1970: Malpractice Canadian Medical Association Journal 102(4): 415-416
Zako, L.R. 1984: Malpractice: where do we go from here? Michigan Medicine 83(8): 108
Obayuwana, A.O. 1981: The malpractice feud Journal of the National Medical Association 73(4): 363-370
Gold, A.R. 1987: Malpractice reform Journal of the American Optometric Association 58(12): 1000-1003
Poitras, J.M.; Smellie, W. 1979: How not to be sued for malpractice Maryland State Medical Journal 28(10): 58
Sandmire, H.F. 1989: Malpractice--the syndrome of the 80s Obstetrics and Gynecology 73(1): 145-146