Surrogate end points in the assessment of benefits of antihypertensive treatment
Salvetti, A.; Kozakova, M.; Buralli, S.
Cardiologia 44 Suppl 1(Part 1): 253-257
1999
ISSN/ISBN: 0393-1978 PMID: 12497917 Document Number: 510854
Document emailed within 1 workday
Related Documents
Avanzini, F.; Alli, C. 1997: Post-infarction arterial hypertension: more benefits or more risks of the antihypertensive treatment? Giornale Italiano di Cardiologia 27(9): 936-944Aberle, B. 1971: Points of view in assessment and treatment of prostatic hypertrophy Wiener Medizinische Wochenschrift 121(37): 638-642
Nguyen, G.; Kisiela, C.; Larher, M.P.; Chiarelli, P.; Krivitzky, A. 1995: Comparison of different methods in the assessment of the ratio of hypertensive patients responding to antihypertensive treatment Archives des Maladies du Coeur et des Vaisseaux 88(8): 1171-1174
Shrake, K.L.; Scaggs, J.E.; England, K.R.; Henkle, J.Q.; Eagleton, L.E. 1994: Benefits associated with a respiratory care assessment-treatment program: results of a pilot study Respiratory Care 39(7): 715-724
McBride, M. 2014: Measuring EHR pain points: high cost, poor functionality outweigh benefits, ease of access Medical Economics 91(3): 28; 30
2005: Insulin in type 2 diabetes: a useful alternative despite limited assessment based on surrogate endpoints Prescrire International 14(79): 187-193
Anderson, P.J. 2000: Assessment end points for inhaled drug delivery Respiratory Care 45(6): 737-755
Palatini, P.; Penzo, M.; Guzzardi, G.; Anaclerio, M.; Pessina, A.C. 1991: Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in the assessment of antihypertensive treatment: 24-h blood pressure control with lacidipine once a day Journal of Hypertension. Supplement: Official Journal of the International Society of Hypertension 9(3): S61-S66
Dobreĭtser, V.I.; Nechaev, I.A. 1970: Indices of pulse and respiration rates in children at various points in the daily routine as criteria of its assessment Gigiena i Sanitariia 35(11): 104-106
Palatini, P. 1999: Dynamic monitoring of blood pressure and assessment of antihypertensive drugs Cardiologia 44 Suppl. 1(Pt 2): 1007-1010
White, W.B. 1999: Circadian variation of blood pressure and the assessment of antihypertensive therapy Blood Pressure Monitoring 4 Suppl. 1: S3-S6
Sarin, R.; Singla, R.; Visalakshi, P.; Jaiswal, A.; Puri, M.M.; Khalid, U.K.; Mathuria, K.; Singla, N.; Behera, D.; Sharma, P.P. 2010: Smear microscopy as surrogate for culture during follow up of pulmonary MDR-TB patients on DOTS Plus treatment Indian Journal of Tuberculosis 57(3): 134-140
Fombershteĭn, K.B. 1979: Anatomic topographic parallels between the pain points and acupuncture points and the effectiveness of local actions in lumbar osteochondrosis Ortopediia Travmatologiia i Protezirovanie 12: 14-16
Dikken, C. 2003: Benefits of using a chemotherapy symptom assessment scale Nursing Times 99(39): 50-51
Kovalenko, O.I.; Macheret, I.L. 2004: Assessment of electrical conductivity in the points of mastoid region of the head in patients with blood circulation disorders in vertebrobasilar vessels Likars'ka Sprava 8: 36-38
Cowley, A.W. 1984: Assessment of the contributions of autoregulatory mechanisms to the antihypertensive actions of beta-adrenergic therapy Hypertension 6(2 Part 1): 137-139
Parati, G.; Pomidossi, G.; Casadei, R.; Ravogli, A.; Trazzi, S.; Mutti, E.; Mancia, G. 1988: 24-h ambulatory non-invasive blood pressure monitoring in the assessment of the antihypertensive action of celiprolol Journal of International Medical Research 16 Suppl. 1: 52a-61a
Alam, I.; Alam, I.; Ali, I.; Ali, M. 2014: Weight loss in HCV patients can be used as a surrogate marker for evaluation of interferon (IFN-α) treatment efficacy - a prospective pilot study Pakistan Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences 27(3): 571-576
Ertl, P. 1993: The multiple benefits of accurate assessment. Effective management of leg ulcers Professional Nurse 9(2): 139-144
White, D.J. 1996: Tartar control: assessment of patient benefits and professional scaling advantages Journal of Clinical Dentistry 7(Special Issue 2): 27-31