Sonographically monitored ovarian stimulation for assisted reproduction: a prospective, blind study
Confino, E.; Binor, Z.; Molo, M.W.; Rawlins, R.; Balos, R.; Mullaney, K.; Radwanska, E.
Journal of Reproductive Medicine 41(1): 7-10
1996
ISSN/ISBN: 0024-7758 PMID: 8855069 Document Number: 468097
OBJECTIVE: To assess prospectively the appropriateness of follicular sonography alone for monitoring ovarian stimulation and to compare it to ovarian monitoring with both follicular sonography and hormone level determinations. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective, blind, clinical study in which the investigator made cycle management decisions based on follicular sonography only. RESULTS: Follicular sonography alone predicted 88% of the decisions made by the combination of follicular sonography, luteinizing hormone (LH), estradiol (E-2) and progesterone measurements. Follicular sonography was unable to predict abnormal E-2 patterns in eight (8%) of the patients' scans. Follicular sonography did not detect three (3%) patients with a premature LH surge. CONCLUSION: Follicular sonograms alone performed during ovarian stimulation predicted 88% of cycle decisions. One could argue that hormone measurements could be either reduced or eliminated during ovarian stimulation for assisted reproductive technology and that follicular sonography only would be a cost-effective compromise. The effect of such simplified monitoring on pregnancy rates would require further prospective evaluation.