Peer review and refereeing in science
Lore, W.
East African Medical Journal 72(5): 335-337
1995
ISSN/ISBN: 0012-835X PMID: 7555893 Document Number: 452897
Document emailed within 1 workday
Related Documents
Hammerschmidt, D.E. 1994: The vagaries of peer review: a new study and our experience. "At a certain level, we all are more or less held hostage to the peer-review system" Journal of Laboratory and Clinical Medicine 124(2): 146-148Averbuch, A.; Roditi, Y.; Zaidenberg, N.J. 2013: PPPC- Peer-2-Peer Streaming and Algorithm for Creating Spanning Trees for Peer-2-Peer Networks Computational Methods in Applied Sciences: 363-377
Rosenberg, E.W. 1972: Self-review conferences: a contribution to problems of continuing education and peer review Journal of the Tennessee Medical Association 65(2): 101-103
McCooey, A.K. 1993: O/WM board members are invited to peer review AHCPR draft of literature review summary on dressings Ostomy/Wound Management 39(4): 8 10
Landers, M.S. 1975: Peer review & record review systems American journal of occupational therapy: official publication of the American Occupational Therapy Association 29(4): 226-228
Ebreo, A.; Feist-Price, S.; Siewe, Y.; Zimmerman, R.S. 2002: Effects of peer education on the peer educators in a school-based HIV prevention program: where should peer education research go from here? Health Education and Behavior: the Official Publication of the Society for Public Health Education 29(4): 411-423
Ebreo, A.; Feist-Price, S.; Siewe, Y.; Zimmerman, R.S. 2002: Effects of peer education on the peer educators in a school-based HIV prevention program: where should peer education research go from here? Health Education and Behavior: the Official Publication of the Society for Public Health Education 29(4): 411-423
Ebreo, A.; Feist-Price, S.; Siewe, Y.; Zimmerman, R.S. 2002: Effects of peer education on the peer educators in a school-based HIV prevention program: where should peer education research go from here? Health Education and Behavior: the Official Publication of the Society for Public Health Education 29(4): 411-423
Strange, V.; Forrest, S.; Oakley, A. 2002: Peer-led sex education--characteristics of peer educators and their perceptions of the impact on them of participation in a peer education programme Health Education Research 17(3): 327-337
Wilbur, R.S. 1970: Peer review. Why do we need it? Journal of the Kansas Medical Society 71(4): 141-144
Offerhaus, L. 1993: Peer review: the all-seeing eye Nederlands Tijdschrift Voor Geneeskunde 137(45): 2331-2333
Overlock, M.E. 1990: The privilege of peer review Journal of the Tennessee Medical Association 83(11): 563-565
Meyers, D.H. 1980: Audit of peer review Medical Journal of Australia 1(5): 237-238
Fleming, R.M. 1970: Peer utilization review Journal of the Florida Medical Association 57(1): 59
Quallich, S.A. 2014: Responding to the peer review Urologic nursing 34(3): 111-112
Shoenfeld, Y.; Shemer, J.; Keren, G. 2006: Peer review--is there a better system? Harefuah 145(8): 581-582
Marks, S 2007: Science, Social Science and Pseudo-Science in the HIV/AIDS Debate in Southern Africa Journal of Southern African Studies 33(4): 861-874
Dunn, L.J. 1978: Peer review: a secret affair? Trustee: the journal for hospital governing boards 31(4): 9
DeMasi, R. 1990: Tips for surviving peer review Pennsylvania Medicine 93(7): 36-37
Griffen, F.Dean. 2003: IOM reports err regarding peer review confidentiality Bulletin of the American College of Surgeons 88(1): 8-11