Liver transplant candidate stratification systems. Implications for third-party payors and organ allocation
Muto, P.; Freeman, R.B.; Haug, C.E.; Lu, A.; Rohrer, R.J.
Transplantation 57(2): 306-308
1994
ISSN/ISBN: 0041-1337 PMID: 8310528 Document Number: 437961
Document emailed within 1 workday
Related Documents
Cardillo, M.; Barraco, F.; De Fazio, N.; Rossini, G.; Pizzi, C.; Boschiero, L.; Nocera, A.; Rigotti, P.; Marchini, F.; Sandrini, S.; Frova, G.; Chiaramonte, S.; Maresca, C.; Caldara, R.; Messa, P.; Berardinelli, L.; Ambrosini, A.; Montanaro, D.; Rampino, T.; Minetti, E.; Gotti, E.; Scalamogna, M. 2005: Renal transplantation in the North Italy Transplant program (NITp): Organ allocation and results Giornale Italiano di Nefrologia: Organo Ufficiale Della Societa Italiana di Nefrologia 22 Suppl. 31: S30-S35La Puma, J. 1995: The Mick and the liver: is organ allocation fair? Managed Care 4(8): 49-50
Benoit, G.; Blanchet, P.; Decaux, A.; Decaris, J.; Joseph, L.; Charpentier, B.; Samii, K.; Huault, G.; Auzepy, P. 1996: Significance of organ donor characteristics in renal function at 1 month: reflection on the allocation of renal transplant Progres en Urologie: Journal de l'Association Francaise d'Urologie et de la Societe Francaise d'Urologie 6(3): 362-367
Lee, Y.M.; Fernandez, M.; Da Costa, M.; Lee, K.H.; Sutedja, D.S.; Tai, B.C.; Tan, K.C.; Isaac, J.; Prabhakaran, K.; Lim, S.G. 2006: MELD may not be the better system for organ allocation in liver transplantation patients in Singapore Singapore Medical Journal 47(7): 592-594
Anonymous. 2002: Working parties in 2002 Mammal working party, beach working party, youth section SJOC, geographical working party, insect working party, aquatic animals working party, hover fly project and ornithological working party Werkgroepen 2002 Zoogdierenwerkgroep, strandwerkgroep, SJOC, geografie werkgroep, insectenwerkgroep, waterbeestjeswerkgroep, zweefvliegenproject, vogelwerkgroep Amoeba. januari; 761: 11-13
Kushniruk, A.W.; Borycki, E.M.; Myers, K.; Kannry, J. 2009: Selecting electronic health record systems: development of a framework for testing candidate systems Studies in Health Technology and Informatics 143: 376-379
Cattorini, P. 2010: Organ allocation. Ethical issues Annali di Igiene: Medicina Preventiva e di Comunita 22(3): 253-261
Grant, D.; Rochon, J.; Levy, G. 1996: Comparison of the long-term tolerability, pharmacodynamics, and safety of Sandimmune and Neoral in liver transplant recipients. Ontario Liver Transplant Study Group Transplantation Proceedings 28(4): 2232-2233
Lubell, J. 2007: Transplant rejections? Tighter organ-transplant restrictions from the CMS could lead to fewer programs; some are leery of changes based on outcomes Modern Healthcare 37(21): 6-7 16 1
Houssin, D. 2004: Ethical perspectives about organ allocation for transplantation Acta Gastro-Enterologica Belgica 67(2): 168-171
Fung, J. 1998: Survival of the sickest. Organ allocation should be based on patients' medical need, not location Modern Healthcare 28(33): 29
MacFadyen, R.J. 2001: Effect of receiving a heart transplant. Research target should be stratification procedures and mechanisms of death Bmj 322(7295): 1180-1181
1998: Unleashed fury. Proposed changes to transplant allocation policy sets off storm of reaction Nephrology News and Issues 12(8): 24 26 31
Tejpar, S. 2005: Risk stratification for colorectal cancer and implications for screening Acta Gastro-Enterologica Belgica 68(2): 241-242
Yium, J.J.; Goldman, M.; Frist, W.H. 1992: Organ transplantation in Tennessee 1989-1990. Report of the Tennessee Transplant Society and the TMA Committee on Organ Procurement Journal of the Tennessee Medical Association 85(1): 9-11
John, R.M. 2008: Crowding out effect of tobacco expenditure and its implications on household resource allocation in India Social Science and Medicine 66(6): 1356-1367
Gruessner, A.C.; Sutherland, D.E.R. 2008: Pancreas transplant outcomes for United States (US) cases as reported to the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) and the International Pancreas Transplant Registry (IPTR) Clinical Transplants 2008: 45-56
Rhodes, G.F.J.; Sampath, R.K. 1988: Efficiency, equity and cost recovery implications of water pricing and allocation schemes in developing countries Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics 36(1): 103-117
Hilbert, L.; Federici, A.B.; Baronciani, L.; Dallagiovanna, S.; Mazurier, C. 2004: A new candidate mutation, G1629R, in a patient with type 2A von Willebrand's disease: basic mechanisms and clinical implications Haematologica 89(9): 1128-1133
Emmanuel, F.; Thompson, L.H.; Salim, M.; Akhtar, N.; Reza, T.E.; Hafeez, H.; Ahmed, S.; Blanchard, J.F. 2013: The size and distribution of key populations at greater risk of HIV in Pakistan: implications for resource allocation for scaling up HIV prevention programmes Sexually Transmitted Infections 89 Suppl. 2: Ii11-Ii17