Two twin girls, legal torts after a tubal sterilization failure, remain in the care of their parents, who were previously informed of this eventuality in writing. A decision of the administrative court of appeals in Nancy, September 30, 1993
Soutoul, J.H.
Journal de Gynecologie Obstetrique et Biologie de la Reproduction 23(8): 932
1994
ISSN/ISBN: 0368-2315 PMID: 7706671 Document Number: 436198
Document emailed within 1 workday
Related Documents
Weber, R.D. 1994: Court of appeals decision in "Premier Plus" has wide ramifications Michigan Medicine 93(12): 9Soutoul, J.H.; Pierre, F. 1986: Technical autonomy with medicolegal risk for the midwife. Reflections on a decision of the Supreme Court of Appeals, 13 December 1983 Revue Francaise de Gynecologie et d'Obstetrique 81(3): 167-169
Heberer, J. 2003: Stand-by service as work time: does everything remain the same after the decision of the Federal Labor Court? Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift für Alle Gebiete der Operativen Medizen 74(3): M78-M79
Carlson, J.; Daly, R.; Zigmond, J. 2011: Appeals court blasts mandate. 11th circuit ruling sets up high court showdown Modern Healthcare 41(33): 4
Fernandez, H.; Panel, P.; Blein, C.; Lamarsalle, L. 2012: Efficacy of Tubal Sterilization: Reported Pregnancies after Tubal Ligation and Essure Hysteroscopic Sterilization French Enquiry 2006-2010 Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology 19(6): S19-S20
Yan, C.; Chuck, A. 2014: Cost Effectiveness of Hysteroscopic Tubal Sterilization (Hts) Compared to Laparoscopic Tubal Sterilization (Lts) for Permanent Birth Control Value in Health 17(3): A160-A161
Yan, C.; Chuck, A. 2014: Cost Effectiveness of Hysteroscopic Tubal Sterilization (Hts) Compared to Laparoscopic Tubal Sterilization (Lts) for Permanent Birth Control Value in Health 17(3): A160-A161
Pincus, R.C. 1993: Has informed consent finally arrived in Australia? A comment on the law following the decision of the High Court of Australia in Rogers v. Whitaker Medical Journal of Australia 159(1): 25-27
Dardiri, I.; Firuzal, R.S.; Affandi, B. 1990: Failure of tubal sterilization in the klinik raden saleh training center indonesia Advances in Contraception 6(4): 265-266
Bostrom, B.A. 2002: In the Michigan Court of Appeals: People vs. Jack Kevorkian Issues in Law and Medicine 18(1): 57-64
Teichert, E. 2016: Appeals court ruling gives FTC merger challenges new life Modern Healthcare 46(40): 9
Sargos, P. 1998: Physicians' duty to inform in the jurisprudence of the Appeals Court Annales de Chirurgie Plastique et Esthetique 43(6): 668-673
Duffy, J. 1986: Supreme Court upholds District Court's Gramm-Rudman decision Health Law Vigil 9(14): 1-3
Brahams, D. 1985: Court of Appeals rules DHSS notice on family planning contrary to law Lancet 1(8419): 59-61
Galloro, V. 2002: Shelter for whistleblowers. Appeals court reinstates False Claims Act lawsuit Modern Healthcare 32(4): 18
Cornell, R.G. 1971: Bio statistics of space exploration microbiology and sterilization final report september 1 1965 september 1 1970 U S Government Research and Development Reports 71(2): 46
Cornell, R.G. 1971: Bio statistics of space exploration microbiology and sterilization final report september 1 1965 september 1 1970 U S Government Research and Development Reports 71(2): 46
Cornell, R.G. 1971: Bio statistics of space exploration microbiology and sterilization final report september 1 1965 september 1 1970 U S Government Research and Development Reports 71(2): 46
Cornell, R.G. 1971: Bio statistics of space exploration microbiology and sterilization final report september 1 1965 september 1 1970 U S Government Research and Development Reports 71(2): 46
Cornell, R.G. 1971: Bio statistics of space exploration microbiology and sterilization final report september 1 1965 september 1 1970 U S Government Research and Development Reports 71(2): 46