Is baseline agitation a relative contraindication for a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor: a comparative trial of fluoxetine versus imipramine
Tollefson, G.D.; Greist, J.H.; Jefferson, J.W.; Heiligenstein, J.H.; Sayler, M.E.; Tollefson, S.L.; Koback, K.
Journal of Clinical Psychopharmacology 14(6): 385-391
1994
ISSN/ISBN: 0271-0749 PMID: 7884018 Document Number: 425428
A common presentation for major depression includes psychomotor agitation. However, this subtype has been the infrequent subject of controlled investigation during depression trials. Yet, the subcategorization of agitated depression has historically been associated with the belief that older, sedating compounds have a superior risk:benefit profile. In the 8-week, double-blind, randomized, parallel trial, 124 subjects with Research Diagnostic Criteria-compatible agitated depression were randomized to either imipramine (IMI) or fluoxetine (FLU). Both compounds proved to be similarly effective as measured by change in HAM-D-17, HAM-D-17 response, and HAM-D-17 remission rates. Similar comparability was seen in secondary measures of agitation, anxiety, suicidality, and global impressions. However, of note, a statistically significant difference in early discontinuations because of intolerable adverse events emerged. Whereas 43.5% of IMI subjects discontinued early, only 9.7% of FLU subjects (p lt 0.001) did. Significantly more central nervous system events characterized the IMI than the FLU subgroup (IMI, 24.2% vs. FLU, 6.5%; p = 0.006). In conclusion, among subjects with major depression, subtype agitated, the risk:benefit profile favored FLU over IMI. This was driven by the superior tolerance of FLU. No evidence emerged in support of the clinical hypothesis that a "sedating" agent is the treatment of choice for this group. The results are important when striving to maximize compliance with pharmacotherapy in order to minimize recidivism and associated psychological and economic morbidity.