The small abdominal aortic aneurysm: the eternal dilemma
Dryjski, M.; Driscoll, J.L.; Blair, R.C.; McGurrin, M.A.; Dagher, F.J.; Ceraolo, M.J.; O'Donnell; Blackshear, W.M.
Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery 35(2): 95-100
1994
ISSN/ISBN: 0021-9509 PMID: 8195284 Document Number: 423018
In order to evaluate morbidity and mortality after elective resection of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) as it relates to aneurysm size, a retrospective review of 111 elective aneurysmectomies over a 5 year period was undertaken in a VA population. Thirty seven AAA's measured < 5 cm in diameter and 74 were > or = 5 cm by CT scan. Patients with small AAA (S-AAA) were significantly younger (mean 64 years) than those with large AAA (L-AAA) (mean 69 years) (p < 0.003). Both groups were similar with respect to prevalence of cardiovascular, pulmonary and renal disease. Aortic cross-clamping time was significantly shorter in L-AAA, possibly because those with S-AAA had a higher prevalence of associated occlusive disease requiring more femoral anastomoses (p < 0.04). Postoperatively six patients (8%) had a myocardial infarction (MI) in the L-AAA group and four (5%) of these died. In contrast no patient with S-AAA suffered a postoperative MI. The rates of non-cardiac complications and length of hospital stay were not significantly different between the two groups. However, the patients with L-AAA stayed longer in ICU (p < 0.05) and the overall combined morbidity rate was significantly higher in this group (p < 0.02). Our results suggest that resection of S-AAA upon diagnosis in acceptable risk patients appears to be the safest overall therapeutic plan.