Theory and practice of functional impression taking of edentulous jaws by Meist's method. Principles for impression taking of edentulous jaws with special regard to "HM" and EX-3-N" materials
Suvin, M.
Zahnarztliche Praxis 22(16): 185-188
1971
ISSN/ISBN: 0044-1651 PMID: 4949533 Document Number: 40067
Document emailed within 1 workday
Related Documents
Suvin, M. 1971: Theory and practice of functional impression taking of edentulous jaws by Meist's method Zahnarztliche Praxis 22(17): 200-202Welker, D.; Hopf, C.; Rothamel, G. 1973: Experimental testing of physical properties of impression materials for edentulous jaw in various processing conditions Deutsche Stomatologie 23(10): 725-742
Engelhardt, J.P. 1970: The intraoral registration of the centric relation in the edentulous jaw in connection with the closed impression technic by means of the SR-Ivotray method Zwr 79(5): 191-197
Fábián, T.; Fejérdy, P. 1979: Prosthetic classification of partially edentulous jaws Fogorvosi Szemle 72(10): 310-315
Shernoff, A.F.; Edmonds, P.P.; Ward, R.D.; Matthews, B.L. 1991: Osseointegrated implants with an intramobile element in the treatment of edentulous jaws Compendium 12(6): 394; 396 398 Passim
Liu, H.C. 1993: A study of temporomandibular joint with retruded closed position of edentulous jaws by CT and MRi Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi 28(1): 44-46; 64
Gallucci, G.O.; Bernard, J-Pierre.; Bertosa, M.; Belser, U.C. 2004: Immediate loading with fixed screw-retained provisional restorations in edentulous jaws: the pickup technique International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants 19(4): 524-533
Pfeiffer, P. 1988: Knowledge of the properties of elastomeric impression materials and their significance for the routine impression--an overview (I) Zwr 97(3): 224-227; 230 233-234
Wiktorsson, G.; Feder, D. 1983: Quality of stone dies produced by different impression materials. a comparative study of impression techniques Swedish Dental Journal 7(2): 77-83
Jemt, T. 1991: Failures and complications in 391 consecutively inserted fixed prostheses supported by Brånemark implants in edentulous jaws: a study of treatment from the time of prosthesis placement to the first annual checkup International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants 6(3): 270-276
Gallucci, G.O.; Papaspyridakos, P.; Ashy, L.M.; Kim, G.E.; Brady, N.J.; Weber, H.-P. 2011: Clinical accuracy outcomes of closed-tray and open-tray implant impression techniques for partially edentulous patients International Journal of Prosthodontics 24(5): 469-472
Moll, A. 1971: Modified impression of root stumps for the manufacture of cast pivot crowns, respectively nuclear build-up of jacket crowns by means of rubberelastic impression materials Zwr 80(2): 51-52
Bénech, P. 1978: Condylar anatomy and physiology in the partially edentulous and totally edentulous person L' Information Dentaire 60(40): 15-31
Small, B.W. 2013: Implant impression techniques including a customized impression tray for nonparallel implants General Dentistry 61(1): 14-16
Fujimoto, K-Ichi. 2011: Clinical Global Impression (CGI), clinician's interview-based impression of change (CIBIC) Nihon Rinsho. Japanese Journal of Clinical Medicine 69 Suppl. 8: 443-449
Lehmann, K.M.; Burgdorf, H.O. 1978: 2-stage impression technic for crowns and bridgework (corrective impression) Zwr 87(9): 430-433
Bahat, O.; Fontanesi, F.V. 2001: Complications of grafting in the atrophic edentulous or partially edentulous jaw International Journal of Periodontics and Restorative Dentistry 21(5): 487-495
Ariely, E. 1975: Practice connected casting method in the partially edentulous dentition for precision prostheses by means of rationally produced biofuncional trays. B Zwr 84(6): 245-248 Concl
Porter, K.H.; Duncan, R.S. 1987: Current restorative impression materials Texas Dental Journal 104(5): 10-11
DeWald, J.P.; Nakajima, H.; Schniederman, E.; Okabe, T. 1992: Wettability of impression materials treated with disinfectants American Journal of Dentistry 5(2): 103-108