Risk factors for local recurrence of rectal carcinoma
Miholic, J.; Loimer, L.; Wrba, F.; Markis, E.; Wollenek, G.; Dieckelmann-Miholic, A.; Moeschl, P.; Wolner, E.
Wiener Klinische Wochenschrift 103(6): 169-175
1991
ISSN/ISBN: 0043-5325 PMID: 2035278 Document Number: 381033
The impact of distal resection margins and the mode of operation on pelvic recurrence rate was assessed in 331 cases following abdomino-perineal resection (APR; n = 134), and anterior resection (AR; n = 197) for rectal cancer. Local recurrence was observed in 55 cases (16.6%) after a median interval of 16 months. Only 20 of 212 patients (9.4%) without positive lymph nodes developed a local recurrence, but 35 of 119 (29.4%) with nodal involvement. The recurrence rate was 33% (10/30) in cases with local spread to adjacent structures (T4), and 15% in cases with less extensive penetration. Of 59 poorly differentiated cancers 15 developed pelvic failure (25%), as opposed to 40 of 272 (14.7%) well or moderately differentiated tumours. 17.7% developed local recurrence after AR, and 14.9% after APR. The recurrence rate following AR was 30% in 33 cases with resection margins less than or equal to 10 mm and 17.4% in 115 cases with margins from 11 to 40 mm, and 10% in 49 cases with wider margins. Cox's multiple proportional hazards regression revealed that nodal involvement (p = 0.0003), local invasion (p = 0.0055), poor differentiation (p = 0.066), and AR vs. APR (p = 0.099) were independent risk factors for pelvic failure. For the AR cases the factors were nodal involvement (p less than 0.0001), local invasion (p = 0.0043), and a resection margin less than or equal to 25 mm on the fixed specimen (p = 0.0039). For patients with negative lymph nodes local invasion was the only independent risk factor, whereas the variables "anterior resection" and narrow resection margin were significant only in node positive cases.