The female condom
Sakondhavat, C.
American Journal of Public Health 80(4): 498
1990
ISSN/ISBN: 0090-0036 PMID: 2316778 DOI: 10.2105/ajph.80.4.498Document Number: 320671
Document emailed within 0-6 h
Related Documents
Smita, J.; Neelam, J.; Rochelle, D.'S.Y.; Kumar, B.K.; Callahan, M.; Suniti, S.; Sanjay, M. 2005: Comparative acceptability study of the Reality female condom and the version 4 of modified Reddy female condom in India Contraception 72(5): 366-371Smita, J.; Neelam, J.; Rochelle, D.'S.Y.; Kumar, B.K.; Callahan, M.; Suniti, S.; Sanjay, M. 2005: Comparative acceptability study of the Reality female condom and the version 4 of modified Reddy female condom in India Contraception 72(5): 366-371
Smita, J.; Neelam, J.; Rochelle, D.'S.Y.; Kumar, B.K.; Callahan, M.; Suniti, S.; Sanjay, M. 2005: Comparative acceptability study of the Reality female condom and the version 4 of modified Reddy female condom in India Contraception 72(5): 366-371
Smita, J.; Neelam, J.; Rochelle, D.'S.Y.; Kumar, B.K.; Callahan, M.; Suniti, S.; Sanjay, M. 2005: Comparative acceptability study of the Reality female condom and the version 4 of modified Reddy female condom in India Contraception 72(5): 366-371
Smita, J.; Neelam, J.; Rochelle, D.'S.Y.; Kumar, B.K.; Callahan, M.; Suniti, S.; Sanjay, M. 2005: Comparative acceptability study of the Reality female condom and the version 4 of modified Reddy female condom in India Contraception 72(5): 366-371
Smita, J.; Neelam, J.; Rochelle, D.'S.Y.; Kumar, B.K.; Callahan, M.; Suniti, S.; Sanjay, M. 2005: Comparative acceptability study of the Reality female condom and the version 4 of modified Reddy female condom in India Contraception 72(5): 366-371
Smita, J.; Neelam, J.; Rochelle, D.'S.Y.; Kumar, B.K.; Callahan, M.; Suniti, S.; Sanjay, M. 2005: Comparative acceptability study of the Reality female condom and the version 4 of modified Reddy female condom in India Contraception 72(5): 366-371
Smita, J.; Neelam, J.; Rochelle, D.'S.Y.; Kumar, B.K.; Callahan, M.; Suniti, S.; Sanjay, M. 2005: Comparative acceptability study of the Reality female condom and the version 4 of modified Reddy female condom in India Contraception 72(5): 366-371
Beksinska, M.E.; Rees, V.H.; McIntyre, J.A.; Wilkinson, D. 2002: Acceptability of the female condom in different groups of women in South Africa - a multicentred study to inform the national female condom introductory strategy SAJOG South African Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 8(1): 14-21
Pablo, V.-M.; Carlos Eduardo, R.ír.; Alejandro, S.-R.D.; Mayra, G.óm.-L.; Claudia, P.ér.-D.án. 2019: Spanish validation of female condom attitude scale and female condom use in Colombian young women Bmc Women's Health 19(1): 128
Pablo, V.-M.; Carlos Eduardo, R.ír.; Alejandro, S.-R.D.; Mayra, G.óm.-L.; Claudia, P.ér.-D.án. 2019: Spanish validation of female condom attitude scale and female condom use in Colombian young women Bmc Women's Health 19(1): 128
Coman, E.N.; Weeks, M.R.; Yanovitzky, I.; Iordache, E.; Barbour, R.; Coman, M.A.; Huedo-Medina, T.B. 2013: The impact of information about the female condom on female condom use among males and females from a US urban community Aids and Behavior 17(6): 2194-2201
Coman, E.N.; Weeks, M.R.; Yanovitzky, I.; Iordache, E.; Barbour, R.; Coman, M.A.; Huedo-Medina, T.B. 2013: The impact of information about the female condom on female condom use among males and females from a US urban community Aids and Behavior 17(6): 2194-2201
Wang, X.; Liu, M.; Cheng, Y. 2016: Acceptability of Phoenurse female condom and second-generation Femidom female condom in Chinese women Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research 42(11): 1567-1574
Wang, X.; Liu, M.; Cheng, Y. 2016: Acceptability of Phoenurse female condom and second-generation Femidom female condom in Chinese women Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research 42(11): 1567-1574
Beksinska, M.; Smit, J.; Greener, R.; Piaggio, G.; Joanis, C. 2015: The female condom learning curve: patterns of female condom failure over 20 uses Contraception 91(1): 85-90
Walsh, T.; Warner, L.; Macaluso, M.; Frezieres, R.; Snead, M.; Wraxall, B. 2012: Prostate-specific antigen as a biomarker of condom failure: comparison of three laboratory assays and self-reported condom use problems in a randomized trial of female condom performance Contraception 86(1): 55-61
Walsh, T.; Warner, L.; Macaluso, M.; Frezieres, R.; Snead, M.; Wraxall, B. 2012: Prostate-specific antigen as a biomarker of condom failure: comparison of three laboratory assays and self-reported condom use problems in a randomized trial of female condom performance Contraception 86(1): 55-61
Ruminjo, J.K.; Steiner, M.; Joanis, C.; Mwathe, E.G.; Thagana, N. 1996: Preliminary comparison of the polyurethane female condom with the latex male condom in Kenya East African Medical Journal 73(2): 101-106
Ruminjo, J.K.; Steiner, M.; Joanis, C.; Mwathe, E.G.; Thagana, N. 1996: Preliminary comparison of the polyurethane female condom with the latex male condom in Kenya East African Medical Journal 73(2): 101-106