Status of cesarean section
Lancet, M.
Harefuah 115(9): 243-247
1988
ISSN/ISBN: 0017-7768 PMID: 3068104 Document Number: 321368
Document emailed within 1 workday
Related Documents
Lazarov, L. 1993: Complications for the mother in vaginal delivery after a prior cesarean section and in parturients with a planned repeat cesarean section Akusherstvo i Ginekologiia 32(3): 13-14Pont'uch, A. 1970: Present status of cesarean section technic Ceskoslovenska Gynekologie 35(9): 551-553
Todumrong, N.; Somprasit, C.; Tanprasertkul, C.; Bhamarapravatana, K.; Suwannarurk, K. 2016: A Comparative Study of the Spontaneous Labor Rate in Scheduled Elective Cesarean Section at 38 Weeks versus 39 Weeks of Gestation in Parturient with Previous Cesarean Section Journal of the Medical Association of Thailand 99 Suppl. 4: S37-S41
Smilov, I.; Mitev, L. 1984: Effect of the intervals of labor induction and uterine-incision delivery on the status of newborn infants in cesarean section Akusherstvo i Ginekologiia 23(5): 404-412
Datta, S.; Brown, W.U.; Ostheimer, G.W.; Weiss, J.B.; Alper, M.H. 1981: Epidural anesthesia for cesarean section in diabetic parturients: maternal and neonatal acid-base status and bupivacaine concentration Anesthesia and Analgesia 60(8): 574-578
Junceda Avello, E.; Pérez Rodrigo, C. 1973: Medical and ethical considerations on repeated cesarean section. Apropos of a 7th cesarean Ginecologia y Obstetricia de Mexico 34(205): 457-465
Haruta, M.; Saeki, N.; Naka, Y.; Funato, T.; Ohtsuki, Y. 1989: Umbilical blood-gas status at cesarean section for breech presentation: a comparison with vertex presentation Nihon Sanka Fujinka Gakkai Zasshi 41(10): 1530-1536
Malinas, Y. 1971: The quality of cesarean section cicatrices. Clinical and radiological evaluation. Status of the problem in 1970. Synthesis of the studies of J. M. Thoulon and P. Magnin (Lyons, 1966-1968) Revue Francaise de Gynecologie et d'Obstetrique 66(2): 79-81 Passim
Sani, G.; Pierfederici, P. 1978: Results of a clinico-statistical study of cesarean section in the 5-year period of 1972-1976. Data concerning 19,638 cesarean sections performed in the University Obstetrical and Gynecological Clinics and the Primary Hospitals of the Regions of Emilia-Romagna, Tuscany and Umbria Minerva Ginecologica 30(11): 905-916
Lin, S.H.; Yao, Q.W. 1985: Cesarean section in eclampsia Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi 20(2): 102-4 127
Nau, J-Yves. 2009: Cesarean section and expediency Revue Medicale Suisse 5(188): 281
Gibbs, C.E. 1983: Cesarean section: 1983 Texas Medicine 79(4): 45-46
D'iakonov, V.A.; Umerenkov, G.P.; Klimenko, P.A.; Makarova, L.D. 1989: The use of ketamine in cesarean section Akusherstvo i Ginekologiia 1989(11): 52-55
Flamm, B.L. 1986: Cesarean section rate Journal of Family Practice 23(5): 425-426
Ruiz Velasco, V.; López Lara, J.A. 1974: Cesarean section in the adolescent Ginecologia y Obstetricia de Mexico 36(218): 365-374
Peña Regidor, P.; Martin Sanchez, A.; Cotte, J. 1968: Syntocinon and cesarean section Gynecologie Pratique 19(5): 335-338
Waniorek, A. 1970: Menouria following cesarean section Ginekologia Polska 41(2): 199-202
Canillas, V. 1974: Cesarean section and eclampsia Ginecologia y Obstetricia de Mexico 36(215): 175-184
Adeleye, J.A. 1982: Classical cesarean section International Surgery 67(4 Suppl): 525-526
Lurie, S.; Sadan, O.; Golan, A. 2007: Re-laparotomy after cesarean section European Journal of Obstetrics Gynecology and Reproductive Biology 134(2): 184-187