Males born in breech presentation 18 years after birth
Nilsen, S.T.; Bergsjø, P.
Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica 64(4): 323-325
1985
ISSN/ISBN: 0001-6349 PMID: 4024881 Document Number: 264941
Forty-two singleton males in breech presentation born vaginally in 1962-63 were re-examined 18 years later at the medical draft board. Compared with all Norwegian conscripts of the same birth cohort, the study group exhibited no statistical difference as regards mortality, morbidity or general intelligence levels.
Document emailed within 1 workday
Related Documents
Manzke, H. 1978: Morbidity among infants born in breech presentation Journal of Perinatal Medicine 6(3): 127-140Milasinović, L.; Nikolić, L.; Kuzmancev, O.; Vuleta, P.; Radeka, G. 1992: Risks for neonates born in the breech presentation Medicinski Pregled 45(5-6): 235-238
Szczurowicz, A.; Witczak, A.; Grotthuss, W. 1984: Fate and condition of infants born in breech presentation Wiadomosci Lekarskie 37(7): 516-521
Vendittelli, F.; Rivière, O.; Pons, J.C.; Mamelle, N. 2002: Breech presentation at term: evolution of French practices and an analysis of neonatal results in regards to obstetrical management of breech presentation, from AUDIPOG Database Journal de Gynecologie Obstetrique et Biologie de la Reproduction 31(3): 261-272
Sarno, A.P.; Phelan, J.P.; Ahn, M.O.; Strong, T.H. 1989: Vaginal birth after cesarean delivery. Trial of labor in women with breech presentation Journal of Reproductive Medicine 34(10): 831-833
Ruckhäberle, K.E.; Viehweg, B.; Vogtmann, C. 1982: Choice of delivery methods for cases of breech presentation, with particular reference to premature birth Zentralblatt für Gynakologie 104(9): 539-549
Lazarov, L.; Lazarov, N. 2008: Rate of cesarean section with breech presentation in Stara Zagora for 12-years period Akusherstvo i Ginekologiia 47 Suppl. 3: 46-47
Collet, J.P.; Lacroix-Liberas, S.; Routhier, J.L.; Piens, A.; Mamelle, N.; Hermier, M.; François, R. 1986: Growth from birth to 2 years of North African infants born in France Archives Francaises de Pediatrie 43(1): 61-65
Saling, E.; Müller-Holve, W.; Berlin-Neukölln 1975: External version of the fetus from breech presentation into vertex presentation during tocolysis Geburtshilfe und Frauenheilkunde 35(2): 151-154
Haruta, M.; Saeki, N.; Naka, Y.; Funato, T.; Ohtsuki, Y. 1989: Umbilical blood-gas status at cesarean section for breech presentation: a comparison with vertex presentation Nihon Sanka Fujinka Gakkai Zasshi 41(10): 1530-1536
Santorelli, G.; Fairley, L.; Petherick, E.S.; Cabieses, B.; Sahota, P. 2014: Ethnic differences in infant feeding practices and their relationship with BMI at 3 years of age - results from the Born in Bradford birth cohort study British journal of nutrition 111(10): 1891-1897
Anderson, A.; Hofer, P.A.; Holmlund, D.E.; Wendel, H. 1974: Pinhole colonic perforation in breech-born infants Surgery 75(4): 617-620
Essel, J.K.; Opai-Tetteh, E.T. 1996: Is routine caesarean section necessary for breech-breech and breech-transverse twin gestations? South African Medical Journal 86(9 Suppl): 1196-1200
Peacock, K. 2014: Why aren't more breech babies Born at home? a student midwife's perspective Midwifery Today with International Midwife 111: 51-52
Hudcovic, A.; Pociatek, A.; Bzdúchová, E.; Gerula, I. 1974: Delivery of breech presentation Bratislavske Lekarske Listy 61(6): 643-648
Berger, C. 2000: Breech presentation: delivery Journal de Gynecologie Obstetrique et Biologie de la Reproduction 29(5): 525-526
Ghose, N. 1984: Breech presentation and obstetricians Journal of the Indian Medical Association 82(9): 337-339
Hájek, Z.; Drbohlav, P.; Melková, J.; Srp, B.; Sindlár, M. 1988: Delivery in breech presentation Ceskoslovenska Gynekologie 53(5): 324-329
Albrechtsen, S.; Dalaker, K. 1994: Breech presentation--classification and nomenclature Tidsskrift for den Norske Laegeforening: Tidsskrift for Praktisk Medicin Ny Raekke 114(16): 1845-1846
Mansani, F.E. 1975: Cesarean section and breech presentation L'Ateneo Parmense. Acta Bio-Medica: Organo Della Societa di Medicina e Scienze Naturali di Parma 46(6): 535-543