Interpretation of rubella serology in pregnancy--pitfalls and problems
Best, J.M.; O'Shea, S.; Tipples, G.; Davies, N.; Al-Khusaiby, S.M.; Krause, A.; Hesketh, L.M.; Jin, L.; Enders, G.
Bmj 325(7356): 147-148
2002
ISSN/ISBN: 1756-1833 PMID: 12130613 DOI: 10.1136/bmj.325.7356.147Document Number: 242466
Document emailed within 0-6 h
Related Documents
Fogel, A.; Barnea, B.S.; Aboudy, Y.; Mendelson, E. 1996: Rubella in pregnancy in Israel: 15 years of follow-up and remaining problems Israel Journal of Medical Sciences 32(5): 300-305Freymuth, F.; Morel, C. 1973: Late rubella serology and gel filtration La Nouvelle Presse Medicale 2(1): 38-39
Namaei, M.H.; Ziaee, M.; Naseh, N. 2008: Congenital rubella syndrome in infants of women vaccinated during or just before pregnancy with measles-rubella vaccine Indian Journal of Medical Research 127(6): 551-554
Gassner, M. 1986: Epidemiology of measles, mumps and rubella in school children--correlation of anamnesis and serology Therapeutische Umschau. Revue Therapeutique 43(8): 635-639
Jindal, S.K. 2001: Spirometry: pitfalls and interpretation Indian Journal of Chest Diseases and Allied Sciences 43(4): 193-195
Naficy, K.; Nategh, R.; Ahangary, S.; Mohsenin, H. 1970: Artificial challenge studies in rubella. Utilization of RA 27-3 rubella vaccines, rubella naturally acquired seropositives, and rubella susceptible children American Journal of Diseases of Children 120(6): 520-523
Vítovec, J.; Zeman, K. 2003: Pitfalls in the interpretation of electrocardiographic signals Vnitrni Lekarstvi 49(9): 713-717
Serman, N.; Singer, S. 2000: Pitfalls in radiographic interpretation, Part 1 Dentistry Today 19(5): 100-105
Gábor, Z. 1993: Economic glossary: pitfalls of interpretation Orvosi Hetilap 134(31): 1699-1702
Majlessi, F.; Batebi, A.; Shariat, M.; Rahimi, A.; Azad, T.M. 2008: Rubella serology in pregnant women attending health centres of Tehran University of Medical Sciences Eastern Mediterranean Health Journal 14(3): 590-594
Adlassnig, K.P.; Horak, W. 1993: The knowledge base of the Hepaxpert i System: automatic interpretation of Hepatitis a and B serology Leber Magen Darm 23(6): 251-260; 263-4; 267-266
Joseph, J.M.; Garber, H. 1970: Laboratory tests for rubella and their interpretation Maryland State Medical Journal 19(3): 71-73
Hassler, D.; Maiwald, M. 1998: Interpretation of borreliosis serology. Step-wise diagnosis--introduction to case examples Fortschritte der Medizin 116(29): 20
Schütz, H.; Pain, A.; Erdmann, F.; Verhoff, M.A.; Weiler, G.ün. 2006: Drug screening in urine--common pitfalls in measurement and interpretation Archiv für Kriminologie 217(1-2): 1-9
Dudkiewicz, D.; Cekański, A.; Poreba, R.; Beldoch, J. 1987: Evaluation of the level of rubella virus antibodies in the sera of pregnant women after exposure to rubella and suspected rubella infection Ginekologia Polska 58(11): 744-748
Miller, E.; Waight, P.; Gay, N.; Ramsay, M.; Vurdien, J.; Morgan-Capner, P.; Hesketh, L.; Brown, D.; Tookey, P.; Peckham, C. 1997: The epidemiology of rubella in England and Wales before and after the 1994 measles and rubella vaccination campaign: fourth joint report from the PHLS and the National Congenital Rubella Surveillance Programme Communicable Disease Report. Cdr Review 7(2): R26-R32
Potapov, M.I. 1976: Medico-legal serology: successes and problems Sudebno-Meditsinskaia Ekspertiza 19(2): 11-15
Zulaica, D.; Arrizabalaga, J. 1987: Problems posed by the patient with positive serology for the HTLV-III/LAV retrovirus Medicina Clinica 88(3): 117-122
Wallon, M.; Franck, J.; Romand, S.; Peyron, F.; Dumon, H.; Thulliez, P. 2001: Value of toxoplasma serology at delivery in women seronegative during pregnancy Journal de Gynecologie Obstetrique et Biologie de la Reproduction 30(7 Part 1): 697-699
Schoenbaum, S.C. 1970: Problems of rubella control New England Journal of Medicine 283(15): 819