What really works? An exploratory study of condom negotiation strategies
Lam, A.G.; Mak, A.; Lindsay, P.D.; Russell, S.T.
Aids Education and Prevention Official Publication of the International Society for Aids Education 16(2): 160-171
2004
ISSN/ISBN: 0899-9546 PMID: 15134124 DOI: 10.1521/aeap.16.2.160.29396Document Number: 233945
Verbal-direct strategies are assumed to be the most effective strategies in negotiating condom use. Both cultural and gender differences in communication styles suggest that individuals may negotiate condoms in ways that are not exclusively verbal and direct. This study examined the use of other forms of condom negotiations by developing an exploratory scale that distinguished strategies on how verbal and direct they were (i.e., verbal-direct, verbal-indirect, nonverbal-direct, nonverbal-indirect). The study compared the use of negotiation strategies among Asian and White American students at a northern California university. Results indicated that although direct strategies (verbal and nonverbal) were more frequently used, condom users also employed indirect strategies (verbal and nonverbal) to negotiate condom use. Moreover, Asians used verbal-indirect strategies more than Whites. Women used nonverbal-indirect strategies more than men. HIV preventions seeking to be culturally sensitive to Asians and women may benefit from incorporating these strategies into their interventions.