Perceived and insurance-related barriers to the provision of contraceptive services in U.S. abortion care settings
Kavanaugh, M.L.; Jones, R.K.; Finer, L.B.
Women's Health Issues Official Publication of the Jacobs Institute of Women's Health 21(3 Suppl): S26-S31
2011
ISSN/ISBN: 1049-3867 PMID: 21530835 DOI: 10.1016/j.whi.2011.01.009Document Number: 217801
Abortion facilities represent a potentially convenient setting for providing contraception to women experiencing unintended pregnancies. This analysis examines a range of factors that may act as barriers to integrating contraceptive and abortion services and documents abortion providers' perspectives on their role in their patients' contraceptive care. Administrators from 173 large, nonhospital facilities that provide abortions in the United States responded to a structured survey between May and September 2009. We used chi-square tests to assess differences in categorical outcomes. Although the majority of U.S. abortion facilities offer a range of contraceptive methods on site, facility staff identified multiple barriers to full integration of the two services, in particular, insurance, patient, and cost barriers. Few of these perceived barriers, however, were associated with differences in the actual provision of most contraceptive methods. Specialized abortion clinics that do not accept health insurance were less likely to have highly effective methods, such as intrauterine devices and implants, on site. Facilities located in Medicaid states were more likely to accept both public and private health insurance for contraceptive services. Increased access to contraceptive services during abortion care is one strategy for reducing repeat unintended pregnancy, and stakeholders at all levels--including abortion providers, insurance companies, and policy makers--have a role to play in achieving this goal.
Document emailed within 0-6 h
