Comparative analysis of meat samples prepared with food chopper and bowl cutter
Pettinati, J.D.; Ackerman, S.A.; Jenkins, R.K.; Happich, M.L.; Phillips, J.G.
Journal - Association of Official Analytical Chemists 66(3): 759-765
1983
ISSN/ISBN: 0004-5756 PMID: 6863196 Document Number: 217619
Analyses of meat samples after preparation with either a bowl cutter or by the official procedure with a food chopper were compared for homogeneity of comminution and for differences in fat, moisture, and protein content. Cutting time in the bowl cutter was limited to minimize temperature rise in samples. Beef chuck, pork shoulder, and beef shank, cheek, and tongue were used in the study. Variances of replicate analysis data for the 5 meat types were pooled for either cutter or chopper treatment and for each analyzed component. Sample portions cut and mixed by using the bowl cutter were more homogeneous than those ground with a food chopper. Comparative accuracy was indicated by fat and moisture means: 5 were in good agreement and 5 differed significantly; 3 of 5 paired protein means differed significantly but were within 0.3% protein. Results on precision and accuracy as well as the simplicity and convenience of the bowl cutter procedure favor its use as an alternative to a food chopper for preparing meat samples for analysis.