Human mate preference: inconsistency between data and interpretations
Carere, C.; Todde, V.; Alleva, E.
Trends in Ecology and Evolution 25(9): 489-90; Author Reply 491-2
2010
ISSN/ISBN: 0169-5347 PMID: 20609492 DOI: 10.1016/j.tree.2010.06.004Document Number: 213259
Document emailed within 0-6 h
Related Documents
Saroja, K.; Surendra, H.S. 1991: A study of postgraduate students' endogamous preference in mate selection Indian Journal of Behaviour 15(1): 1-13Vinyard, C.J.; Thompson, C.L.; Doherty, A.; Robl, N. 2016: Preference and consequences: A preliminary look at whether preference impacts oral processing in non-human primates Journal of Human Evolution 98: 27-35
Backwell, P.R.Y.; Jennions, M.D. 1993: Mate choice in the neotropical frog, Hyla ebraccata: sexual selection, mate recognition and signal selection Animal Behaviour 45: 48-50
Backwell, P.R.Y.; Jennions, M.D. 1993: Mate choice in the neotropical frog, Hyla ebraccata: sexual selection, mate recognition and signal selection Animal Behaviour 45: 48-50
Chang, S.; Kim, C-Youn.; Cho, Y.Seok. 2017: Sequential effects in preference decision: Prior preference assimilates current preference Plos one 12(8): E0182442
Lagakos, S.W. 1974: Interpretations of survival-type data arising from clinical trials Seminars in Oncology 1(3): 279-284
Percheron, G.; François, C.; Yelnik, J. 1986: Relations between the basal ganglia and the thalamus of the primate. New morphologic data. New physiopathologic interpretations Revue Neurologique (Paris) 142(4): 337-353
Langley, R.G.B.; Reich, K.; Papavassilis, C.; Fox, T.; Gong, Y.; Gu Ttner, A. 2017: Methods for Imputing Missing Efficacy Data in Clinical Trials of Biologic Psoriasis Therapies: Implications for Interpretations of Trial Results Journal of Drugs in Dermatology: Jdd 16(8): 734-741
Das, N. 1987: Sex preference and fertility behavior: a study of recent Indian data Demography 24(4): 517-530
Das, N. 1987: Sex preference and fertility behavior: a study of recent Indian data Demography 24(4): 517-530
Kodak, T.; Fisher, W.W.; Kelley, M.E.; Kisamore, A. 2009: Comparing preference assessments: selection- versus duration-based preference assessment procedures Research in Developmental Disabilities 30(5): 1068-1077
Litwin, S.D. 1973: Allotype preference in human Rh antibodies Journal of Immunology 110(3): 717-721
Sielken, R.L.; Stevenson, D.E. 1992: Comparisons of human cancer potency projections for dieldrin based on human data with those based on animal data Progress in Clinical and Biological Research 374: 295-319
Tammelleo, A.D. 1994: Liability for failure to spot inconsistency in orders. Case in point: St. Germain V. Pfeifer 637 N.E.2d 848 MA (1994) Regan Report on Nursing Law 35(4): 2
Patrick Festy, I.K.andG.D.R. 2002: One Wedding, Two Divorces?: Consistency and Inconsistency of Male and Female Responses in Russian Divorce Surveys Population (English Edition, 2002-) 57(1): 9-30
Castaman, G.; Eikenboom, J.C.; Bertina, R.M.; Rodeghiero, F. 1999: Inconsistency of association between type 1 von Willebrand disease phenotype and genotype in families identified in an epidemiological investigation Thrombosis and Haemostasis 82(3): 1065-1070
Qian, Z.; Lichter, D. T.; Mellott, L. M. 2005: Out-of-Wedlock Childbearing, Marital Prospects and Mate Selection Social Forces 84(1): 473-491
Alvergne, A.; Lummaa, V. 2010: Does the contraceptive pill alter mate choice in humans? Trends in Ecology and Evolution 25(3): 171-179
Knaus, E.; Arbeiter, K. 1972: Synchronization of estrus in sheep using Synchro-mate vaginal sponges Wiener Tierarztliche Monatsschrift 59(8): 263-266
Fujioka, M. 1986: Infanticide by a male parent and by a new female mate in colonial egrets Auk 103.3: 619-621