Appointment reminders to reduce no-show rates. A stratified analysis of their cost-effectiveness
Bigby, J.; Giblin, J.; Pappius, E.M.; Goldman, L.
JAMA 250(13): 1742-1745
1983
ISSN/ISBN: 0098-7484 PMID: 6411944 Document Number: 202851
To determine whether reminders are cost-effective for an adult primary care internal medicine center, we randomized 590 scheduled, follow-up appointments to no reminder, computer-generated letter reminders, and telephoned reminders. The no-show rate was reduced from 24% in the control group to 14% in the reminder groups, and letter and telephoned reminders were equally effective. An economic analysis showed that about two thirds of the savings realized from reminders was generated in 23% of the patients whose prior predicted probability of a no-show appointment was above 20%. However, in our primary care center, computer-generated letter reminders were estimated to be cost-effective whenever the probability of a no-show was above 5%, and telephoned or manual letter reminders were estimated to be cost-effective whenever the probability of a no-show was above about 11%. Based on our sensitivity analysis, telephoned or manual letter reminders should be cost-effective in many other ambulatory settings as well, although in some settings, reminders may be restricted to patients at high risk for no-show behavior.