The place of caesarean section and choice of method
Araujo, J.G.; Oliveira, F.C.
Clinics in Obstetrics and Gynaecology 9(3): 757-772
1982
ISSN/ISBN: 0306-3356 PMID: 6756756 Document Number: 191903
Document emailed within 1 workday
Related Documents
Krepelka, P. 2008: Caesarean section--indication or choice? Ceska Gynekologie 73(5): 303-307Kok, N.; Ruiter, L.; Hof, M.; Ravelli, A.; Mol, B.W.; Pajkrt, E.; Kazemier, B. 2014: Risk of maternal and neonatal complications in subsequent pregnancy after planned caesarean section in a first birth, compared with emergency caesarean section: a nationwide comparative cohort study Bjog: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 121(2): 216-223
Hall, M.H. 1994: Variation in caesarean section rate. Maternal mortality higher after caesarean section Bmj 308(6929): 654-655
Verhoeven, A.T.M.; de Leeuw, J.P.; Bruinse, H.W. 2005: Breech presentation at term: elective caesarean section is the wrong choice as a standard treatment because of too high risks for the mother and her future children Nederlands Tijdschrift Voor Geneeskunde 149(40): 2207-2210
Poonam; Banerjee, B.; Singh, S.N.; Raina, A. 2006: The Misgav Ladach method: a step forward in the operative technique of caesarean section Kathmandu University Medical Journal 4(2): 198-202
Johnson, K.C.; Gaskin, I.M. 2001: Vaginal delivery after caesarean section. Safety of single-layer suturing in caesarean sections must be proved Bmj 323(7324): 1307-1308
Nuttall, C. 2000: Caesarean section controversy. The caesarean culture of Brazil Bmj 320(7241): 1074
Ksykiewicz-Dorota, A.; Adamska-Kuźmicka, I. 2001: Method of Patient Classification System in obstetric staff scheduling. III. Demand for direct nursing in the delivery room among mothers who deliver by Caesarean section Annales Universitatis Mariae Curie-Sklodowska. Sectio D: Medicina 56: 307-311
Frost, J.; Shaw, A.; Montgomery, A.; Murphy, D.J. 2009: Women's views on the use of decision aids for decision making about the method of delivery following a previous caesarean section: qualitative interview study Bjog: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 116(7): 896-905
Magadi, M.A. 2016: HIV/AIDS and Contraceptive Method Choice: Demographic and Socio-Economic Correlates of Contraceptive Method Choice among HIV-Positive Women Practising Family Planning in Kenya HIV/AIDS Research and Treatment - Open Journal 3(1): 1-12
Magadi, M.A. 2016: HIV/AIDS and Contraceptive Method Choice: Demographic and Socio-Economic Correlates of Contraceptive Method Choice among HIV-Positive Women Practising Family Planning in Kenya HIV/AIDS Research and Treatment - Open Journal 3(1): 1-12
Magadi, M.A. 2016: HIV/AIDS and Contraceptive Method Choice: Demographic and Socio-Economic Correlates of Contraceptive Method Choice among HIV-Positive Women Practising Family Planning in Kenya HIV/AIDS Research and Treatment - Open Journal 3(1): 1-12
Magadi, M.A. 2016: HIV/AIDS and Contraceptive Method Choice: Demographic and Socio-Economic Correlates of Contraceptive Method Choice among HIV-Positive Women Practising Family Planning in Kenya HIV/AIDS Research and Treatment - Open Journal 3(1): 1-12
Magadi, M.A. 2016: HIV/AIDS and Contraceptive Method Choice: Demographic and Socio-Economic Correlates of Contraceptive Method Choice among HIV-Positive Women Practising Family Planning in Kenya HIV/AIDS Research and Treatment - Open Journal 3(1): 1-12
Chamberlain, G. 1991: Caesarean section rates in the UK Lancet 337(8750): 1167
Yam, I.; Rubin, A.P. 1992: Emergency caesarean section British Journal of Hospital Medicine 48(5): 244
Peterson, H.B.; Rubin, G.L.; Rochat, R.W. 1980: Safety of caesarean section Lancet 2(8194): 587
Ghose, N. 1983: Caesarean section on the rise Journal of the Indian Medical Association 81(9-10): 176-177
Torrie, J.; Eltringham, R.J. 1989: Complications in caesarean section British Journal of Hospital Medicine 41(4): 396
Eijsink, J.J.H.; van der Leeuw-Harmsen, L.; van der Linden, P.J.Q. 2008: Pregnancy after Caesarean section: fewer or later? Human Reproduction 23(3): 543-547