Drug interference with clinical tests performed by a 20-channel computerized autoanalyzer
Yosselson-Superstine, S.
American Journal of Hospital Pharmacy 39(5): 848-849
1982
ISSN/ISBN: 0002-9289 PMID: 7081263 Document Number: 191893
Document emailed within 1 workday
Related Documents
Yosselson-Superstine, S.; Granit, D.; Superstine, E. 1980: Drug interferences with tests performed by a 12-channel autoanalyzer American Journal of Hospital Pharmacy 37(10): 1333-1338Nishikaze, O. 1975: Drug-drug interaction and drug-induced interference with clinical laboratory test procedures--chairman's introductory remarks Rinsho Byori. Japanese Journal of Clinical Pathology 23(2): 75
Wright, B.T.; Robinson, L.A. 1982: Pediatric drug information: tests for glucose in the urine: understanding test specificity and interference Pediatric Nursing 8(1): 44-45
Siest, G.; Delwaide, P.; Malya, P.A.G.; Breuer, H.; Galteau, M.M.; Salway, J.G.; Tognoni, G.; Tryding, N. 1988: International Federation of Clinical Chemistry, Scientific Committee: Drug interferences and drug effects in clinical chemistry. Part 6. Laboratory tests in monitoring drug administration Journal of Clinical Chemistry and Clinical Biochemistry 26(3): 181-186
Grötsch, H.; Hajdu, P. 1987: Interference by the new antibiotic cefpirome and other cephalosporins in clinical laboratory tests, with special regard to the "Jaffé" reaction Journal of Clinical Chemistry and Clinical Biochemistry 25(1): 49-52
Delgado García, G. 1979: Results of intradermal tests with toxoplasmin in a survey performed among mental patients admitted to the clinical surgical teaching hospital "10 de Octubre" in Havana Revista Cubana de Medicina Tropical 31(1): 67-71
Birx, D.L.; Berger, M.; Fleisher, T.A. 1984: The interference of T cell activation by calcium channel blocking agents Journal of Immunology 133(6): 2904-2909
Buschmann, G. 1972: Clinical drug tests in swine Deutsche Tierärztliche Wochenschrift 79(14): 348-351
Browne, T.R. 1993: Clinical trials performed for the new drug approval process in the United States: standard methods and alternative methods Epilepsy Research. Suppl 10: 31-44
Crickx, B.; Lazareth, I. 1990: Scleroderma. which tests should be performed? Annales de Dermatologie et de Venereologie 117(1): 83-86
Tarnow, E. 2005: Proactive interference, retroactive interference--what about self-interference? a new interpretation of the recency-primacy shift Medgenmed: Medscape General Medicine 7(1): 5
Bircher, J. 1982: Clinical usefulness of tests of hepatic drug metabolism Agressologie: Revue Internationale de Physio-Biologie et de Pharmacologie Appliquees Aux Effets de l'Agression 23(A): 31-34
De Luca, A. 2012: Pre-clinical drug tests in the mdx mouse as a model of dystrophinopathies: an overview Acta Myologica: Myopathies and Cardiomyopathies: Official Journal of the Mediterranean Society of Myology 31(1): 40-47
Axelsson, C.G. 1990: Let us avoid cholesterol tests performed by pharmacies! Lakartidningen 87(40): 3172
John, R.; Othman, S.; Parkes, A.B.; Lazarus, J.H.; Hall, R. 1991: Interference in thyroid-function tests in postpartum thyroiditis Clinical Chemistry 37(8): 1397-1400
Borner, K. 1977: The Greiner Selective Analyzer. II. Status of the development of a clinical-chemical autoanalyzer (proceedings) Journal of Clinical Chemistry and Clinical Biochemistry 15(8): 446-447
Rytwiński, K.; Wójcik, Z.; Sońta-Jakimczyk, D.; Sroczyńska, M. 1985: Clinical picture of myelocytic leukemia in children, drug sensitivity tests and DNA histograms Acta Haematologica Polonica 16(3-4): 170-178
Stitt, F.W.; Latour, R.; Frane, J.W. 1977: A clinical study of naproxen-diazepam drug interaction on tests of mood and attention Current Therapeutic Research 21(2): 149-156
Rebaiz, K.; Roujeau, J.C.; Gluckman, J.C.; Beaufils, H.; Jacob, N.; Legrain, M. 1979: Glomerulonephritis: critical evaluation of immunological tests performed routinely La Nouvelle Presse Medicale 8(35): 2801-2805
Davidson, K.W.; Kahn, A.; Price, R.D. 1987: Reduction of adverse drug reactions by computerized drug interaction screening Journal of Family Practice 25(4): 371-375