Comparison of some criteria used in the assessment of fetal age
Senecal, J.; Defawe, G.; Ade, E.; Le François, M.C.
Annales de Pediatrie 26(10): 682-686
1979
ISSN/ISBN: 0066-2097 PMID: 233484 Document Number: 147054
Document emailed within 1 workday
Related Documents
Bador, P.; Petit, O. 1998: Factor impact and indexing in bibliographic databases: comparison of these quality criteria for the assessment of pharmaceutical journals Journal de Pharmacie de Belgique 53(2): 71Corazza, G.R.; Bonvicini, F.; Frazzoni, M.; Gatto, M.; Gasbarrini, G. 1982: Observer variation in assessment of jejunal biopsy specimens. a comparison between subjective criteria and morphometric measurement Gastroenterology 83(6): 1217-1222
Alegre, B.; Bretó, M.; Salvadó, J.; Sendra, R.; Gresa, M.; Argudo, A. 1983: Assessment of fetal maturity by measurement of the phospholipids in the amniotic fluid. Comparison of the results with the lecithin/sphingomyelin ratio Annales de Biologie Clinique 41(3): 219-220
Egewarth, C.; Pires, F.D.A.; Guardiola, A. 2002: Assessment of gestational age of preterm newborn based on neurological examination, obstetric dating criteria and pediatrics criteria Arquivos de Neuro-Psiquiatria 60(3-B): 755-759
Seddon, M.; Broad, J.; Crengle, S.; Bramley, D.; Jackson, R.; White, H. 2006: Coronary artery bypass graft surgery in new Zealand's Auckland region: a comparison between the clinical priority assessment criteria score and the actual clinical priority assigned New Zealand Medical Journal 119(1230): U1881
Seddon, M.; Broad, J.; Crengle, S.; Bramley, D.; Jackson, R.; White, H. 2006: Coronary artery bypass graft surgery in new Zealand's Auckland region: a comparison between the clinical priority assessment criteria score and the actual clinical priority assigned New Zealand Medical Journal 119(1230): U1881
Vintzileos, A.M.; Campbell, W.A.; Rodis, J.F.; McLean, D.A.; Fleming, A.D.; Scorza, W.E. 1991: The relationship between fetal biophysical assessment, umbilical artery velocimetry, and fetal acidosis Obstetrics and Gynecology 77(4): 622-626
Tannirandorn, Y.; Kittipibul, V. 2001: Short fetal acoustic stimulation test for rapid antepartum assessment of fetal well-being Journal of the Medical Association of Thailand 84(4): 520-524
Evans, M.I.; Sacks, A.J.; Johnson, M.P.; Robichaux, A.G.; May, M.; Moghissi, K.S. 1991: Sequential invasive assessment of fetal renal function and the intrauterine treatment of fetal obstructive uropathies Obstetrics and Gynecology 77(4): 545-550
Thanaboonyawat, I.; Wataganara, T.; Boriboonhiransarn, D.; Viboonchart, S.; Tontisirin, P. 2006: Effect of halogen light in fetal stimulation for fetal well-being assessment Journal of the Medical Association of Thailand 89(9): 1376-1380
Satoh, K.; Sakata, H.; Nishijima, S.; Fujimoto, S.; Koga, Y.; Nakano, H.; Maeda, H.; Matsumoto, N.; Nakabayashi, M.; Takagi, K. 1992: Assessment of fetal lung maturity using newly developed immunological measurement of fetal pulmonary surfactant apoprotein-A in amniotic fluid Nihon Sanka Fujinka Gakkai Zasshi 44(10): 1269-1276
van Geijn, H.P. 1989: Modern biophysical criteria of fetal well-being Contributions to Gynecology and Obstetrics 17: 10-17
Bunin, A.T.; Medvedev, M.V. 1985: Diagnostic criteria for fetal growth retardation during ultrasound examinations Akusherstvo i Ginekologiia 12: 26-30
Shturkalev, I.; Smilov, I.; Mitev, L. 1975: Difference between maternal and fetal pH and the BE-ECF criteria for the evaluation of the status of the fetus during labor Akusherstvo i Ginekologiia 14(1): 1-6
Henrion, R.; Cedard, L.; Centene, J. 1972: Biologic surveillance of human pregnancy. Criteria of fetal distress and maturity Journal de Gynecologie Obstetrique et Biologie de la Reproduction 1(5 Suppl 2: 307-308
Manning, F.A.; Harman, C.R.; Morrison, I.; Menticoglou, S. 1990: Fetal assessment based on fetal biophysical profile scoring. III. Positive predictive accuracy of the very abnormal test (biophysical profile score = 0) American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 162(2): 398-402
Favre, R.; Nisand, I.; Messer, G. 1991: Middle cerebral artery fetal velocimetry: criteria for extraction in severe growth retardation Journal de Gynecologie Obstetrique et Biologie de la Reproduction 20(5): 699-706
Calne, R. 1994: Criteria and assessment of immunosuppressive agents Transplantation Proceedings 26(6): 3279
Brédart, A.; Mignot, V.; Rousseau, A.; Dolbeault, S.; Beauloye, N.; Adam, V.; Elie, C.; Leonard, I.; Asselain, B.; Conroy, T. 2005: Cancer patient's satisfaction assessment using the EORTC QLQ-SAT32: comparison between self-assessment and interview response Revue d'Epidemiologie et de Sante Publique 53 Spec no 1: 1s31-1s38
Chaovisitsaree, S.; Namwongprom, S-nong.; Morakote, N.; Suntornlimsiri, N.; Piyamongkol, W. 2007: Comparison of osteoporosis self assessment tool for Asian (OSTA) and standard assessment in Menopause Clinic, Chiang Mai Journal of the Medical Association of Thailand 90(3): 420-425