Long-term efficacy of pre- and post-dilution online hemodiafiltration with dialyzer reuse
Tiranathanagul, K.; Susantitaphong, P.; Keomany, C.; Mahatanan, N.; Praditpornsilpa, K.; Eiam-Ong, S.
Journal of the Medical Association of Thailand 95(5): 650-656
2012
ISSN/ISBN: 0125-2208 PMID: 22994023 Document Number: 13389
Growing evidence has demonstrated the potential survival benefit of online hemodiafiltration (HDF) over conventional hemodialysis (HD). Previous studies regarding online HDF utilized single-use dialyzer The present study was conducted to compare the long-term clinical parameters between pre- and post-dilution online HDF with the reuse dialyzer This 2-year historical cohort study was conducted in 20 chronic hemodialysis patients who had undergone thrice-a-week pre-dilution online HDF for at least one year. The patients were switched to post-dilution online HDF for another year. Reuse dialyzers were utilized in both methods. No pyrogenic reactions had been detected throughout the 2-year study period. The C-reactive protein (CRP) and nutritional parameters were in good normal ranges. The normalization of protein equivalent of nitrogen appearance (nPNA) was significantly higher during the post-dilution period (1.25 +/- 0.22 vs. 1.11 +/- 0.14 g/kg/d, p < 0.01). Regarding adequacy of hemodialysis, the post-dilution online HDF showed significantly better Kt/V than the pre-dilution mode (2.46 +/- 0.35 vs. 2.35 +/- 0.35, p < 0.05) whereas the predialysis beta2-microglobulin levels were not different (23.43 +/- 5.35 vs. 23.73 +/- 5.55 mg/L, NS). The numbers of reuse were comparable (17.3 +/- 2.6 vs. 16.4 +/- 2.7, NS). Utilizing reuse dialyzer in online HDF could provide efficacy, safety, cost saving, and environmental benefit. The post-dilution technique yielded the better adequacy and nutritional status without causing the limitation in the reuse number and would be the standard mode-of-choice for online HDEF
Document emailed within 1 workday
