Sugar as a topic of scientific and pseudoscientific discussion
Cremer, H.D.
Deutsche Zahnarztliche Zeitschrift 32(5 Suppl. 1): S4-11
1977
ISSN/ISBN: 0012-1029 PMID: 266468 Document Number: 116816
Document emailed within 1 workday
Related Documents
Broadbent, J.M. 2013: The community water fluoridation 'debate': scientific consensus versus pseudoscientific confusion New Zealand Dental Journal 109(3): 86Hierholzer, E. 1997: Topic for discussion. Ambulatory appendectomy by the established surgeon Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift für Alle Gebiete der Operativen Medizen 68(3): Suppl. 76-9
Meyer zu Schwabedissen, O.A. 1978: Discussion to the 2nd main topic "Rational diagnosis and therapy" Verhandlungen der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Innere Medizin 1978(84): 267-268
1979: Panel discussion on the topic: "Metabolic problems in relation to the operating procedure and postoperative care" Vnitrni Lekarstvi 25(4): 354-355
Delvecchio, C. 1996: From scientific evidence to practice guidelines: points for a discussion Epidemiologia E Prevenzione 20(4): 296-300
Kobayashi, N.; Sawada, K.; Kobayashi, M. 1979: Naturalness and the scientific nature of breast feeding. A discussion Josanpu Zasshi 33(9): 570-581
Zhukovskii, A.M. 1980: Results of the scientific discussion on the origin of epidemic influenza viruses Voprosy Virusologii 1980(4): 499-506
Valenzuela, C.Y. 1985: Introduction, hypothesis and discussion in theses or factual scientific articles Revista Medica de Chile 113(9): 913-915
Castro, A.A. 1999: Structuring the discussion of scientific papers. Randomised controlled trial of structured discussions is needed Bmj 319(7209): 581
Ernst, E. 2004: My pseudoscientific nightmare Medical Journal of Australia 180(11): 591
Puget, J 2017: Discussion of Dominique Scarfones Paper, On That Is Not Psychoanalysis: Ethics as the Main Tool for Psychoanalytic Knowledge and Discussion: Terminable and Interminable Discussion Psychoanalytic Dialogues 27(4): 401-405
Puget, J 2017: Discussion of Dominique Scarfones Paper, On That Is Not Psychoanalysis: Ethics as the Main Tool for Psychoanalytic Knowledge and Discussion: Terminable and Interminable Discussion Psychoanalytic Dialogues 27(4): 401-405
Puget, J 2017: Discussion of Dominique Scarfones Paper, On That Is Not Psychoanalysis: Ethics as the Main Tool for Psychoanalytic Knowledge and Discussion: Terminable and Interminable Discussion Psychoanalytic Dialogues 27(4): 401-405
Gershanovich, V.N.; Timakov, V.D. 1996: V. D. Timakov's struggle against pseudoscientific trends in microbiology and virology Zhurnal Mikrobiologii Epidemiologii i Immunobiologii 1996(3): 7-10
Kuate-Defo, B. 2004: Young people's relationships with sugar daddies and sugar mummies: what do we know and what do we need to know? African Journal of Reproductive Health 8(2): 13-37
Van Eijk, A. 1971: Organoleptic problems in exchange of sugar using sugar substitutes in food Deutsche Zahnarztliche Zeitschrift 26(11): 1079-1085
2015: How Sweet It Isn't. Newly Discovered Documents Reveal Sugar Industry's Efforts 60-Plus Years Ago to Influence Federal Policy Regarding Sugar Consumption Dentistry Today 34(4): 56 58
Kravchenko, L.V.; Sorokina, E.I.; Tyshko, N.V.; Chernysheva, O.N.; Avren'eva, L.I.; Guseva, G.V. 2002: Medico-genetic evaluation of sugar sand, obtained from genetically-modified sugar beet line 77 (toxicologico-biochemical studies) Voprosy Pitaniia 71(3): 28-31
Verspohl, E.J. 2014: Importance of sugar and sugar substitutes Medizinische Monatsschrift für Pharmazeuten 37(5): 191-192
Bennett, E.L.; Rosenzweig, M.R.; Domino, E.F.; Krnjevic; Ryall, R.W.; Margules, D.L. 1969: Comments and general discussion central cholinergic transmission and its behavioral aspects discussion Federation Proceedings 28(1): 158-159